Verand for law firms Internal-reviewed pack

SEO and AI visibility for law firms, with your state's advertising rules switched on.

Name your bar during setup and Verand assigns the state-bar pack: ABA Model Rules 7.1 to 7.3 as the baseline your state adopted. From then on every draft is checked against it before it can leave, and a lawyer at your firm presses publish. It cannot publish for you. Ever.

Sources

Primary law first, and the citation gets checked.

At least 3 per article, 1 from the primary tier. Wikipedia, Reddit and Quora are banned domains.
Your state
bar
How it works

Four steps between a blank page and a post your bar would allow.

ABA Model Rules Confirmed
State bar Confirmed
Federal regulator None
01

Name your bar

Either body assigns the state-bar pack. No federal regulator governs lawyer advertising, so the baseline is the Model Rules your state adopted. Declare "not regulated" and the truth-in-advertising floor still gates you.

Draft · 55 checksPass 9/9
02

Every draft hits the gate

Research, brief, draft in your voice, then the checks. A blocked draft stays in Verand with the sentence marked.

Draft in WordPress Landed
Publish Yours to press
03

You publish

A draft in WordPress or a pull request on your repo. Nothing goes live without a person at your firm.

Google #5 ↑2
ChatGPT Cited
Claude Cited
Gemini Not yet
Perplexity Cited
AI Overviews Cited
04

Track where you rank

Daily positions in Google, and whether ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity and AI Overviews cite your firm when someone asks a legal question.

Compliance gate

Your practice's language.
Your bar's limits.

The governing body, the required disclaimer and the banned claims load from the state-bar pack. The draft is written around them, in your voice and with your firm's facts, then the gate reads the finished HTML and stops the one sentence Rule 7.1 would not let you publish.

55 checks on every draft. Compliance is a gate, not a score: Pass or Blocked, and a hard rule has no override. Name your bar at onboarding and this pack loads the same way. Pause the demo, scrub it, read the why.

Brand Hubus-state-bar-generic v2.0.0

Governing body

ABAABA · Model Rules 7.1 and 7.2United StatesUnited States

Base YMYL Foundation, US Attorney / Law Firm (generic state-bar baseline) v2.0.0. Researched from the regulators' own text and tested by Verand. Not reviewed by a licensed attorney. Enforced automatically, not editable here.

Experience & Facts0 pinned1 pinned2 pinned

We take fewer than one in five of the injury cases we screen.

via Added manually·May 9, 2026

Our median case runs fourteen months from filing to resolution.

via Added manually·Jun 21, 2026
EditorDraft · Harlow & Vance Injury Law
how-long-a-rear-end-collision-claim-takesDraft · autosavedPublish blocked

How long a rear-end collision claim really takes

A rear-end claim is rarely about fault. It is about the medical record, the gap between the crash and the first visit, and whether the adjuster believes the treatment plan.

At Harlow and Vance our median case runs fourteen months from filing to resolution, and we take fewer than one in five of the cases we screen, because the ones we take we intend to finish.

We guarantee a settlement on every rear-end collision case we accept, usually within a year of filing.
Report Card55 checks
Three dials and one gateRe-validating on save1 blocker
Compliance · gatePass · 4/4Blocked · 3/4
✔
Required disclaimeri
✔✘
Banned claimsi

law-bc-002-unjustified-expectations · "…guarantee a settlement…"

✔
Citation densityi
✔
Source qualityi
Why it was blockedus-state-bar-generic 2.0.0
Hard tier · no overridelaw-bc-002-unjustified-expectations

Content creates an unjustified expectation about results by guaranteeing or promising an outcome. ABA Model Rule 7.1 prohibits statements likely to create unjustified expectations about the results a lawyer can achieve. Remove the guarantee; describe past results factually with a 'prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome' qualifier.

"We guarantee a settlement on every rear-end collision case we accept, usually within a year of filing."
Basis
ABA Model Rule 7.1 (Comment, unjustified expectations)
Fix
Remove 'guaranteed'/'we will win'. Describe outcomes factually and add: 'Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.'
Disclaimer
The pack requires law-disc-not-legal-advice ("Legal Disclaimer", before sources section). It is in the draft, so that row stays green.
United StatesIn the U.S.
ABA, FTC
CanadaIn Canada
the provincial law societies (Law Society of Ontario, Law Society of BC, Barreau du Quebec) and the Federation of Law Societies of Canada · on the roadmap

US Attorney / Law Firm (generic state-bar baseline) v2.0.0 · researched from the regulators' own text and tested by Verand · not reviewed by a licensed attorney · your counsel confirms applicability; not legal advice.

Every plan: the truth-in-advertising floor and 55 checks. Regulator packs like us-reg-d: every plan. Researched from the regulators' own text and tested by Verand. Not reviewed by a licensed attorney.

Harlow & Vance Injury Law is the home page's example firm. The rules, ids and disclaimers are the shipped pack's; the firm, its facts and the draft are illustrative.

1 The pack

One answer at setup, and the bar rules arrive with it.

Pick the bar you are admitted to. Verand maps them to the state-bar pack and the YMYLYMYL: Your Money or Your LifeGoogle's name for content that can affect a reader's health, finances, safety or legal position. Search quality raters hold those pages to a higher bar for accuracy, sourcing and author expertise, so thin or unsourced pages in these niches are the first to lose visibility.Verand’s YMYL floor is the set of rules every regulated site carries, whichever regulator it answers to. floor rides underneath it whatever you pick.

The pack's rules go into the drafting prompt, so most drafts never hit the gate at all.
The same rules run as deterministic checks on the finished HTML. The prompt is a courtesy; the validator is the law.
Editing the list can never switch a gate off. Removing a body re-runs the assignment; the floor stays.
Onboarding · Step 3 · Governing bodies
IndustryLegal / Law firm
CountryUnited States
BodiesABA Model RulesState bar
Assignedus-state-bar-generic, internal-reviewedbase-ymyl floor, always onDisclaimer, citations and schema required
Confirmed.The deep crawl of your site starts now.
2 The gate

A blocked draft never leaves the building.

The checks run on the finished HTML, not on the outline. Does anything promise an outcome, is the disclaimer in, are the figures cited to a primary source, does a sentence hint at pull with a judge. One screen, in words.

Pass or Blocked on the gate, with 6 of 6 beside it.
Anything flagged links to the sentence, with a suggested rewrite.
No schedule, routine or robot can press publish for you. There is no setting that turns that off.
Draft · How long a rear-end collision claim really takesBlocked · 5 of 6
law-bc-002 · unjustified expectations · hard
…whether the adjuster believes the treatment plan.
- We guarantee a settlement on every rear-end case we accept.
+ We take fewer than one in five of the cases we screen. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Most claims resolve before a petition is…
BasisABA Model Rule 7.1   Comment, unjustified expectationsNo override on this tier
Apply the fix, re-validate.Then it is Pass, 6 of 6, and yours to publish.
3 Keeping it current

When a rule number changes, the page changes with it.

Legal content ages on a calendar too: filing deadlines, damages caps, fee schedules, the year in "reviewed for". The year-rollover routine reads every live page, finds the dated figures, and proposes each change as a line edit you approve or reject. Nothing is rewritten wholesale.

Per occurrence, on the live page, applied only after you approve.
Runs on every plan. So does the compliance gate, the full crawl and every routine.
Year rollover · /blog/texas-injury-claim-deadlines2 proposed
Occurrence 1 of 2
- Reviewed for 2026. The deadlines below reflect the rules in force this year.
+ Reviewed for 2027 [confirm]. The deadlines below reflect the rules in force this year.
The general rule for a negligence claim is…
Lines you have not confirmed stay marked.The routine never invents a date or a figure.
4 Being the answer

The assistant recommends counsel. Verand logs whether it was you.

Every morning Verand runs your clients' questions past ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode the questions your prospects ask a lawyer, and Perplexity and Claude once a week. Each answer is read and logged: whether you were cited, which page, in what position, and which firms were named instead. Each engine gets its own share of voice.

Prompts written for a law firm at setup: what a claim is worth, how long a case takes, whether to talk to the adjuster, who to hire in your city.
One record per prompt per assistant. The share-of-voice number is computed against the competitors you track.
25 to 200 prompts by plan, pooled across your sites.
ChatGPT
Gemini
AI Overviews
AI Mode
Perplexity
Claude
Recorded ChatGPT · today 09:02
Cited
Page/blog/how-long-a-rear-end-collision-claim-takes
Position#2 of 3Also cited
Share of voice by engine

Harlow & Vance Injury Law and four tracked competitors · last 14 days

Day 1
Across six engines
Share of brand mentions across active prompts
The answer · a prospect's question on ChatGPT, read and recorded0:00 / 0:30
What the pack holds

Fifteen rules and four requirements, as the pack ships them.

This table is the pack as a law firm sees it in Brand Hub, not a paraphrase of it. The ids are the ones you will see on a blocked draft, and the list is read-only: editing it can never switch a gate off.

Brand Hub · From your compliance pack · us-state-bar-generic 2.0.0 + base-ymyl 2.0.0Internal-reviewed
RuleBasisTierId
Guaranteeing or promising an outcomeABA Model Rule 7.1 · Comment, unjustified expectationsBlockslaw-bc-002
"Best attorney", "#1 law firm" and other unsubstantiated comparisonsABA Model Rule 7.1 · overridable with a logged written reasonBlockslaw-bc-003
Implied ability to influence a court, judge or officialABA Model Rule 8.4(e) · Model Rule 7.1Blockslaw-bc-006
Guaranteed resultsFTC Act §5 · 16 CFR 255Blocksymyl-guaranteed-results
Guaranteed financial returnFTC Act §5Blocksymyl-guaranteed-returns
"Risk-free" or "zero risk"FTC Act §5 · overridable with a logged written reasonBlocksymyl-risk-free · ymyl-zero-risk
"You can't lose", get-rich-quick languageFTC Act §5 · FTC "Making Money" guidanceBlocksymyl-cant-lose · ymyl-get-rich-quick
"Your money is safe", "principal protected" without the conditionsFTC Act §5 · overridable with a logged written reasonBlocksymyl-principal-safety
"We have never lost money", "double your money"FTC Act §5 · overridable with a logged written reasonBlocksymyl-never-lost-record · ymyl-double-your-money
"Never lost a trial", "98% success rate" and other record claimsABA Model Rule 7.1 · Comment [3], past results · overridable with a logged written reasonBlockslaw-bc-010
"No win, no fee" framing that hides case costsModel Rules 7.1, 1.5(c), 1.8(e) · FL 4-7.13 / 4-7.14 · AZ ER 7.2(d)(1)Warnslaw-bc-009
Universal "everyone should" recommendationsFTC Act §5, misleading by omissionWarnsymyl-everyone-should
Your own banned claimsAnything your state bar bans that the pack does not. Added in Brand Hub, gated like a pack rule.Blockssite-owned
Legal disclaimer, prior-results notice on case results · 3 citations, 1 primary · Article schema · banned-phrase scanRequired on every article. Primary tier: law.cornell.edu supremecourt.gov uscourts.gov congress.gov ecfr.gov americanbar.org your state barRequiredv12 · v15 · v14 · v2
Read-only.Validated against ABA Model Rules and FTC rules; researched from the regulators' own text and tested by Verand. Not reviewed by a licensed attorney. Your counsel confirms applicability. Not legal advice. State-by-state overlays are documented and not yet shipped.
Integrations

Your site, whoever built it.

WordPress and static sites on GitHub today, with Search Console, Analytics and Business Profile behind every audit. Some law-firm website platforms are one of those two underneath. The largest are walled, and we say so rather than chip them as coming.

See every integration →
Built
WordPress
GitHub
Search Console
Analytics 4
Business Profile
Claude
ChatGPT
WordPress
GitHub
Search Console
Analytics 4
Business Profile
Claude
ChatGPT
Roadmap
ComingWebflow
ComingWix
ComingHubSpot CMS
ComingGhost
PossibleShopify
ComingWebflow
ComingWix
ComingHubSpot CMS
ComingGhost
PossibleShopify
Justia ElevateConnectsWordPress underneath, so the WordPress integration reaches it. The capability probe reports what the site will accept before anything is written.
FindLaw, ScorpionDoes not connectWalled platforms with no content API. Verand cannot publish into them, and we say so rather than chip them as coming. Firms on either usually move the blog to WordPress or a Git repo and keep the rest of the site where it is.
Everything elseSend the URLVerand detects what a site is built on when you connect it. WordPress or a Git repo connects. Anything else, we tell you before you sign up for anything.
What doing this properly takes

Nine jobs between a topic and a published post.

There are nine jobs behind a single published post. Eight of them move across. The one that stays is a lawyer reading the draft. Most firms are not choosing between tools for these; they are choosing between doing none of it and an agency that has never read Rule 7.1.

Writing in the firm's voice, with the firm's facts

A partner, after hours. Or an agency writing for any law firm.
Drafted from your knowledge base and your positions, with a named attorney as author.

Picking the right target topics

Whatever came up in an intake call that week.
A topical map, competitor gaps and Search Console opportunities, ranked, with a brief behind each.

Writing for search engines and the AI assistants

A title tag, if the website builder had a field for it.
55 checks on every article: structure, schema, answer blocks, the terms the top results share.

Checking every sentence against Rules 7.1 to 7.3

Nobody, or the same partner rereading the post before it goes up.
Six hard rules and seven review rules on every draft. Blocked drafts do not leave.

Citing primary sources

Rarely. A link to the statute if someone remembers.
Three citations required, one from law.cornell.edu, uscourts.gov, congress.gov or your state bar.

Keeping deadlines, caps and dated lines current

A January scramble, or the 2024 figures stay up.
Year rollover proposes every dated line as an edit for approval.

Knowing where the firm ranks, and whether assistants name it

Search Console, opened at quarter end. The assistants, never.
Daily positions, and a record of every answer across six assistants.

Business Profile, citations, local schema

Set up once, years ago, by whoever built the site.
Audited on every crawl, generated where missing, kept consistent.

The one job that stays yours

Reading the draft and pressing publish. Everything above exists to make that five minutes instead of two hours. No schedule, routine or connector can press it for you.

Pass · 6 of 6PublishYours to press
At most firms todayOn Verand
What most firms are quoted instead
$5,000a month, typical content and SEO agency retainer
1 job in full, 3 in part, 5 not at all
  • Writing and publishing
  • Target topics from your site's data sometimes
  • Search and AI-assistant optimization search only
  • Your voice, your first-hand facts generic
  • Checked against the Model Rules and your bar
  • Primary-source citations required
  • Year rollover of live pages
  • Rank and AI-visibility tracking
  • Publishing only with your approval usually
33×the price of Starter, for half the list
Verand Starter
$149a month, every routine and the compliance gate included
All nine. The ninth stays yours, by design
  • Writing and publishing
  • Target topics from your site's data
  • Search and AI-assistant optimization both
  • Your voice, your first-hand facts
  • Checked against the Model Rules and your bar every draft
  • Primary-source citations required 3 per article
  • Year rollover of live pages
  • Rank and AI-visibility tracking daily
  • Publishing only with your approval always

The retainer figure is a typical quote for a content and SEO agency serving professional firms, not a survey result. Starter is $149 a month billed monthly.

In this section

What your bar actually allows, one page at a time.

1,374,720 active lawyers in the US (ABA National Lawyer Population Survey, 2025). 156,583 law firms (US Census Bureau, Statistics of US Businesses 2022, NAICS 541110 offices of lawyers). Validated against ABA Model Rules and FTC rules; researched from the regulators' own text and tested by Verand. Not reviewed by a licensed attorney. Your counsel confirms applicability. Not legal advice.

Questions

What a managing partner wants answered first.

Who reviewed the rules, which disclaimer goes in, and whether your website platform connects.

Is the pack attorney-verified?

No. It is researched from the regulators' own text and tested by Verand, not reviewed by a licensed attorney, and it is labelled that way everywhere it appears. The hard gate fires identically whatever the label says. Your counsel confirms applicability to your firm and state.

How many lawyers does this actually apply to?

The ABA's National Lawyer Population Survey counts 1,374,720 active lawyers in the United States for 2025, and the Census Bureau counts 156,583 law firms in its 2022 Statistics of US Businesses. Every one of them advertises under a state version of Model Rules 7.1 to 7.3. The pack is that baseline; your state's additions are documented and, where not yet shipped, yours to add in Brand Hub.

Which disclaimer goes in?

Two ship with the pack. The legal disclaimer (law-disc-not-legal-advice) goes on every article: informational only, not legal advice, no attorney-client relationship without a written engagement. The prior-results notice (law-disc-prior-results) is required wherever an article describes case results, and it carries the "attorney advertising" line some states require. The disclaimer page in this section walks through both.

What about my state's rules?

The pack is the generic baseline: ABA Model Rules 7.1 to 7.3, with the contingent-fee rule sourced from Florida and Arizona. There is no federal regulator for lawyer advertising, so your state's version is the one that binds you. State-by-state overlays are documented and not yet shipped. Anything your bar bans that the pack does not, you add in Brand Hub as your own banned claim and it hard-gates like a pack rule.

Justia, FindLaw, Scorpion, and the other law-firm website platforms?

Justia Elevate is WordPress underneath, so Verand connects through the WordPress integration and the capability probe tells you what the site will accept before anything is written. FindLaw and Scorpion are walled platforms with no content API. They do not connect, and we say so rather than chip them as coming.

Customer stories

Operators growing with Verand.

repliers.43%of AI answers, up from 11%

How Repliers went from 11% to 43% of AI answers

“Every tool we tried told us how visible we were. Verand told us that and why we weren’t. It listed 60 developer questions where a competitor’s API got named instead of ours, drafted the answer to each one in our engineers’ voice, and we went from 11% of AI answers to 43% in two months. One of our best inbound channels now is a chatbot.”
Pat Arlia
Co-Founder & COO, Repliers
oneday4×AI citations

How Oneday opened a new client channel through ChatGPT

“Our clients find us by asking ChatGPT whether someone with their diagnosis can get life insurance. A year ago we weren’t in that answer. Amongst many things, Verand built a page for every condition we cover, checked every claim against the rules before it could publish, and our citations on ChatGPT and Gemini are up 4×. New clients tell us where they found us. It’s ChatGPT.”
Josh Teixeira
CEO, Oneday
The Mill Gardens Apartment Homes46%of ChatGPT answers

How a Georgia rental community shows up in nearly half of ChatGPT’s answers

“Renters ask ChatGPT what it’s like to live near Robins Air Force Base. We’re in that answer now, with a link. Verand flagged that our address was written three different ways across the site, it generated the LocalBusiness schema, it wrote the Bonaire and Warner Robins guides, and it tracked which assistants picked them up. A property with 60 units shouldn’t be able to do this. We did it in a quarter.”
Marco Canonaco
Co-Founder, The Mill Gardens Apartments
Verand for law firms

Content your state bar allows, found in AI answers from ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Perplexity and Claude. The advertising rules checked first.

Written from your practice and your results, the way you would say them. Found on Google and across six assistants. Every draft stops at the state-bar advertising rules, then at a lawyer at your firm.

Seven days, every feature unlocked, one click to cancel.

Compliance gate
Draft, paragraph 3

The 2019 fund returned 14.2% net to investors, and this offering carries guaranteed returns of 12 to 15% over a five year hold.

Base rules for every regulated siteHard rule

A guaranteed return is deceptive in any financial context and can be a securities violation. Say targeted or projected return, with its basis.

Ruleymyl-guaranteed-returns
Packbase-ymyl
BasisFTC Act §5; SEC Marketing Rule 206(4)-1; Reg D anti-fraud provisions
ChatGPT
Gemini
AI Overviews
AI Mode
Perplexity
Claude
Recorded ChatGPT · today 09:02
Cited
Pagewillowdaleequity.com/blog/syndication-minimums
Position#2 of 3Also cited
Share of voice by engine

Willowdale Equity and four competitors · 14 days

YouEquityMultipleBAM CapitalOrigin InvestmentsAshcroft Capital
Day 1
Across six engines31%You 27%14%11%8%
Share of brand mentions across active prompts
The answer · a buyer's question on ChatGPT, read and recorded0:00 / 0:30
Verand

Content built to rank in Google and get cited by ChatGPTPerplexityGeminiClaude, with every claim checked before it goes live.

support@verand.ai

© 2026 Verand. All rights reserved. TermsPrivacyAI policyAccessibilitySecurity
Not legal advice. Compliance packs are researched from the regulators' own text and tested by Verand, not reviewed by a licensed attorney.