Verand works for every industrythe list keeps goingMortgage brokersRulebook if you have one. Truthfulness floor if you do not. Either way: no guaranteed outcomes, no implied endorsement, every claim substantiated.See the 55 checks →
YouEquityMultipleBAM CapitalOrigin InvestmentsAshcroft Capital
Day 1
Across six engines31%You 27%14%11%8%
Share of brand mentions across active prompts
The answer · a buyer's question on ChatGPT, read and recorded0:00 / 0:30
Researched from the regulators' own text and tested by Verand. Not reviewed by a licensed attorney. Your counsel confirms applicability. Not legal advice.How we review →
43 free tools are live, no signup needed. Product questions start in the help centre.Open the help centre →
Claude Visibility Tracker for regulated firms.
Verand asks Claude the questions your buyers ask, once a week, every week, and records whether it named you, where in the answer, and which sites it cited instead of yours. Claude will often name a firm without linking to it, so named and cited are separate fields here and they frequently disagree. Five more assistants run the same prompt set alongside it. The content that moves those numbers is drafted from your own credentials and cannot publish until it clears the compliance gate.
Same prompt set, five more assistantsChatGPTGeminiAI OverviewsAI ModePerplexity
One Claude answer, parsed. Mentioned, cited and third among the brands it named, the answer as Claude wrote it, and all sixteen sources it used, the firm's own among them, each labelled owned, competitor or editorial.
Definition
What is a Claude visibility tracker?
A Claude visibility tracker asks Claude a fixed set of questions on a schedule and records what came back: whether your brand was named, how early among the brands it named, whether your own site was cited, which competitors were named beside you, and how the answer described you. It is brand monitoring for a surface with no results page to check, so the tracker has to keep the answers themselves.
Verand asks Claude with web search on, every time, so the answer it reads is the one that carries sources, and stores each answer as one row whether or not you are in it. Two numbers roll the rows up, both counted from the answers rather than estimated. Each has its own page.
Your share of the mentions of you and your tracked rivals across the answers, counted beside each rival's from the answers that actually came back, never weighted or judged by a model.
Share of Voicei
27%
#2 of 9 tracked
The same header, with your standing among the rivals you track on this site.
Set up once
Two things to configure. Four things back, every week.
Claude visibility tracking needs nothing installed on your site. You confirm the brand Claude should be looking for and the questions it should be asked, and every check then hands back the same four facts. Onboarding does most of it: the brand is read from your domain and the first prompt set is generated from your Brand Hub, so the first scan runs before you have typed anything.
Claude visibility trackingChecked weekly
Your brand
Northgate Tax Advisorynorthgatetax.com
Your prompt set
Which CPA firm in Austin should I use for an S-corp, and how do they set my reasonable salary?
1 of 25 questions, generated from the Brand Hub. Edit any of them or add your own; at most one in five may name your brand.
The first scan runs during onboarding, across all six assistants, before you reach the paywall. Your plan then sets how many stay on the dashboard; Claude sits in the top group, on Professional and above, because asking it costs materially more than asking the daily four.
Northgate Tax Advisory is an example CPA firm. The plans, cadences and prompt rules above are the shipped product's.
What comes back from every check
Mentioned, or not. The answer either contains your brand or it does not. One boolean, stored either way, and the basis of every rate on this page.
Position. First firm named and seventh firm named are not the same result, so the check records the order of your first mention among the brands in the answer.
Cited, or not, and by which sources. Claude names firms in prose and links only what it retrieved, so this is a different question from the one above and often a different answer. Every link is resolved to a domain and labelled owned, competitor, editorial or user-generated.
Every other brand named. Your tracked competitors are scored from the same response, so their standing costs nothing extra.
Those four are the chips and lists in the answer panel at the top of this page. Everything on the dashboard is arithmetic over them, plus one judged field, sentiment, run over the answers that named you.
Sourcing
How Claude finds, and how it sources.
Claude answers in one of two ways, and only one of them leaves a trail you can go and earn. It is the biggest single difference between tracking Claude and tracking a search-first assistant.
Two answer modes, one of which has no links
Ask Claude something it already knows and it answers from what it learned in training: fluent, confident, and with nothing to click. Ask it something current and it searches first, then writes with inline citations. Search is a deliberate step rather than a reflex, and it shows in the response: a grounded answer arrives as a short preamble saying it is going to search, then the substantive answer, and only that second part carries the annotations.
Verand asks Claude with web search on, every time, because the searched answer is the one that carries sources, and a source is the thing you can go and earn. What Claude says about you with search off is a different question, this page does not measure it, and no number here claims otherwise.
The index behind the search, stated carefully
Anthropic lists Brave Search as a web search subprocessor. It has not named a search partner in a product announcement, and a second web search subprocessor is listed alongside Brave, so this is what a subprocessor list says rather than a published partnership. Treat it as directional.
The practical consequence is worth acting on either way: Claude's search leg is not Google's index, so being crawled and ranked by Google does not on its own make you retrievable here. Anthropic's documentation names three crawlers, ClaudeBot for training data, Claude-User for the fetches a person's question triggers, and Claude-SearchBot for search. A robots.txt blocking all three takes you out of the surface this page measures.
Claude also reports the sub-queries it ran to answer a prompt. Verand keeps them: each one is a real question being asked around your topic, and each arrives as a row you can track on its own or turn into a brief.
Every answer
The answer is kept, not summarised.
Every answer sits under the question that produced it, with how many of that question's answers named you. Expand one and each assistant gets a row for its latest answer, misses included: a miss is stored exactly like a hit, which is why the figure beside the question is a rate rather than a run of good days. Under each row, See earlier answers opens that assistant's history in place. Open any row and the answer is there in full, with every source it used.
Every answer we got backi
The latest answer from each assistant, per prompt. Click any row to read it in full.
Last 30 daysOct 9 – Nov 8, 202659 prompts
Engine
Mentioned
Cited
Pos
Brands
Sources
When
Find me the best multifamily real estate syndication companies in the southern U.S. for 2026.Named you in 18 of 88 answers
PerplexityRead answer
●
○
#4
10
GeminiRead answer
○
○
—
1
ChatGPTRead answer
○
○
—
22
ChatGPTRead answer
●
●
#3
16
ChatGPTRead answer
○
○
—
19
ChatGPTRead answer
○
○
—
20
Google AI ModeRead answer
○
○
—
1
Google AI OverviewsRead answer
○
○
—
3
List the top real estate investment firms in Middle Georgia focusing on Class B/C apartments.Named you in 33 of 96 answers
I'm considering investing through a self-directed IRA. What should I know about using it for real estate syndications?Named you in 0 of 93 answers
Compare Willowdale Equity's syndication opportunities with those offered by BAM Capital.BrandedNamed you in 102 of 102 answers
Claude rank tracker
A position in the answer, not on a page.
A generated answer has no blue links to count, so there is no rank in the search sense. Verand reads the answer text, finds the first mention of every brand it tracks and numbers them in the order they appear. Named before anyone else and you are #1, scoring 1.0; each place below is worth 0.15 less, floored at 0.1. Average position is the mean across the answers that named you, so #1.5 says you usually open the answer or sit one name behind. Rivals are scored from the same responses, so a gap here is a real difference rather than two tools measured differently.
Rankings
You vs. tracked competitors across all AI engines
Brand
Visibility
SoV
Sentiment
Avg Pos
Trend
1Equitymultiple
38%
31%
—
#1.3
2Willowdale EquityYou
34%
27%
71
#1.4
3BAM Capital
26%
14%
—
#1.6
4Origin Investments
22%
11%
—
#1.8
5Ashcroft Capital
18%
8%
—
#2.0
6Wildhorn Capital
9%
4%
—
#2.3
7Vikingcapllc
7%
3%
—
#2.5
8LSCRE
5%
1%
—
#2.6
9Goodegg Investments
4%
1%
—
#2.9
Sources
The pages it quotes instead of yours.
Every source in every answer is kept and typed in code: yours, a tracked competitor's, one of twelve community platforms, or editorial by default. Remove your own domain and what is left is the citation gap. Where to get mentioned ranks the pages in it that name your competitors and not you, and gives each the move that fits it: a ranked list is a pitch for inclusion, an independent guide is a quote or a cited figure to earn, a competitor's own page says publish your equivalent, and a government page can't be earned, so you cite it. This is where a tracker stops being a dashboard: each source comes with its move and a drafted pitch, and when the move is to publish your own page, that article is written with your experience facts and clears the compliance gate before anyone can publish it.
Where to get mentionedi
Highest-cited pages from
Pages AI already trusts for your prompts. A mention here is how rivals get named.
6 best bets name your rivals and not you. The matrix ranks all 400 and says what to do about each.
Working for:Vikingcapllc 29Equitymultiple 27BAM Capital 22you 0
→Earn a quote or a cited figure. An independent guide cited for 18 of your prompts; answers citing it name Vikingcapllc, Equitymultiple and BAM Capital. Offer the author one specific thing (a stat, a practitioner quote), or publish the page AI would cite instead for those prompts.
Working for:Origin investments 11Vikingcapllc 7BAM Capital 6you 0
→Earn a quote or a cited figure. An independent guide cited for 9 of your prompts; answers citing it name Origin investments, Vikingcapllc and BAM Capital. Offer the author one specific thing (a stat, a practitioner quote), or publish the page AI would cite instead for those prompts.
Working for:Ashcroft Capital 130BAM Capital 57Origin investments 31you 8
→Pitch for inclusion. A ranked list AI reads as the market: answers citing it name Ashcroft Capital, BAM Capital and Origin investments, never you. Offer the author what the list rewards (custodianship and execution and transparency); lists like this are refreshed yearly, so ask before the next update.
Not listed above: 20 competitor and government pages, including the most-cited (origininvestments.com 187×, origininvestments.com 148×). They can't be earned; the matrix shows what to learn from them.
V
Want this done for you?Coming soonWe can get you placed on the pages AI assistants already cite: we work this list, you review the mentions.
Weekly
Asked every Monday, one point per scan.
Claude is asked weekly, alongside Perplexity, while ChatGPT, Gemini and Google's two AI answers are asked daily. The cadence belongs to the assistant, not to your plan: a Claude answer costs materially more to collect, which is why weekly is the normal setting for Claude across this category and why several platforms keep Claude tracking on their higher tiers. Each scan contributes one point, the share of that scan's answers that named you, plotted on the day it ran; vs competitors puts your tracked rivals on the same axis. Filter any tab to Claude and the same arithmetic runs on Claude alone.
Visibility trendi
34%+4%vs prior scan
Showing all engines · change the Models filter above to focus one engine.
Weekly history
Claude’s answers, week after week.
Claude is asked once a week, so its history in the log reads in weeks: 3, 10, 17 and 24 days ago. The latest answer named Willowdale second, the one before named it third and cited its site, and the two before that missed it: named in 2 of 4, as the line under the row says.
Every answer we got backi
The latest answer from each assistant, per prompt. Click any row to read it in full.
Last 30 daysOct 9 – Nov 8, 202659 prompts
Engine
Mentioned
Cited
Pos
Brands
Sources
When
Find me the best multifamily real estate syndication companies in the southern U.S. for 2026.Named you in 18 of 88 answers
PerplexityRead answer
●
○
#4
10
GeminiRead answer
○
○
—
1
ClaudeRead answer
●
○
#2
22
ClaudeRead answer
●
●
#3
16
ClaudeRead answer
○
○
—
19
ClaudeRead answer
○
○
—
20
Google AI ModeRead answer
○
○
—
1
Google AI OverviewsRead answer
○
○
—
3
List the top real estate investment firms in Middle Georgia focusing on Class B/C apartments.Named you in 33 of 96 answers
I'm considering investing through a self-directed IRA. What should I know about using it for real estate syndications?Named you in 0 of 93 answers
Compare Willowdale Equity's syndication opportunities with those offered by BAM Capital.BrandedNamed you in 102 of 102 answers
Sample size
Claude’s number with its sample size.
Hover your row in Rankings and the card splits your visibility by assistant, each with the answers behind it. Claude names Willowdale in 26% of its answers, and the /67 beside that says the figure rests on 67 of them, against 345 for each assistant asked daily. Weekly means a smaller sample, and the card shows it rather than hiding it.
Rankings
You vs. tracked competitors across all AI engines
Brand
Visibility
SoV
Sentiment
Avg Pos
Trend
1Equitymultiple
38%
31%
—
#1.3
2Willowdale EquityYou
34%
27%
71
#1.4
3BAM Capital
26%
14%
—
#1.6
4Origin Investments
22%
11%
—
#1.8
5Ashcroft Capital
18%
8%
—
#2.0
6Wildhorn Capital
9%
4%
—
#2.3
7Vikingcapllc
7%
3%
—
#2.5
8LSCRE
5%
1%
—
#2.6
9Goodegg Investments
4%
1%
—
#2.9
Willowdale Equity
your brand
34%
visibility · named in 506 of 1,489 answers
By assistant
ChatGPT41%/345Google AI Overviews29%/320Google AI Mode33%/345Perplexity31%/67Claude26%/67Gemini37%/345
Rankings
Can you track rankings in Claude?
Not the way you track them on Google, and any Claude rank tracker showing you a stable position 3 is computing something it is not telling you about. A Google result is close to stable: two people searching the same phrase on the same day see broadly the same ten links, which is why rank tracking works at all. Claude is not built that way. The same question asked twice can return different firms in a different order, because the model samples its own output and because the pages it retrieves change underneath it.
The honest unit above that position is a rate. Every prompt is asked on the assistant's own cadence, one ask per prompt per scan, and the dashboard reports the share of answers that named you, the share that cited you, and how both moved. One answer is a reading. On a weekly assistant a month is four of them, which is worth knowing before reading a single week as a trend.
Why two Claude trackers can disagree about you. Usually one counts mentions and the other counts citations. Claude names firms in prose freely and links only what it retrieved, so a brand can be named in most answers and cited in almost none, and then scores well on one tool and badly on another. Verand stores and shows both, because the gap between them is the actionable part: mentions say Claude knows you, citations say a page of yours was worth quoting.
Where it is asked from. Google's two AI answers are checked from a location you set per site, down to city level. The Claude read is not: it carries no region, because a chat answer is the same from anywhere, so nothing here claims a city-level Claude result.
One more limit, stated plainly. An answer that comes back without you in it is a stored row with mentioned set to false, which is why the trend shows the scan where you dropped out. A failed ask is a third thing, kept with the provider's own error message. And one check legitimately records nothing at all: Google renders no AI Overview for some queries, and there is no brand to find in an answer that does not exist, so its check count runs below the prompt count on purpose. The number is also only as good as the questions behind it, which is why at most one prompt in five may name your brand.
Two assistants, two jobs
Why Claude and ChatGPT are not one number.
Both get asked the same prompt set here and both are scored by the same arithmetic. They are collected differently and they behave differently, which is why Verand keeps them as separate engines rather than blending them into one AI score.
Where they differ
Claude
ChatGPT
How the answer is collected
Asked directly with web search turned on, because no consumer read exists for it.
Read from the consumer product with web search on, with a second path when that read comes back empty.
Cadence
Weekly, on Mondays, with Perplexity. It is the pricier read of the two.
Daily, with Gemini and Google's two AI answers.
Which plans include it
Professional and above, where all six assistants are read.
Every plan, including Starter.
Naming against linking
Names firms in prose and links only what it retrieved, so mentioned and cited routinely disagree on the same row.
Links what it read, and the sources ride with the answer.
Where it is asked from
No region on the read. A chat answer is the same from anywhere, so no location is claimed.
As a searcher in your country, set per site.
Everything else is identical: the prompt set, the four recorded facts, the position scoring, the citation labelling and the compliance gate on anything you publish. One blended AI score would average the differences above into something nobody can act on. ChatGPT has its own page: the ChatGPT Visibility Tracker.
Regulated firms
Why Claude visibility is different for regulated firms.
Every tracker in this category measures whether you were named. For a firm with a licence, a regulator and a duty of care, two further questions matter more, and none of the Claude trackers we reviewed asks either.
When Claude gets your credentials, fees or services wrong
A wrong answer about a consumer brand is a lost sale. A wrong answer about a regulated firm is a claim you did not make, circulating under your name: a minimum investment you do not offer, a designation you do not hold, a fee you no longer charge. It is harder to trace in Claude than in a search result, because an answer written from training knowledge carries no link to argue with.
Verand extracts the checkable claims an assistant makes about you from the answers that named you, attributes each to the assistant that said it, and asks you to mark it correct or incorrect. An incorrect claim takes your correction, is watched until it stops appearing, and becomes a brand fact the generator writes from, so your own pages stop feeding the error. For a registered investment adviser that matters twice: the SEC Marketing Rule governs what your marketing may say, Verand's RIA compliance pack encodes it, and the page you publish to correct the record is checked against that rule before it can go live. Broker-dealer content answers to a different regime and is not in that pack.
The sources Claude trusts in your field
In a consumer category the sources an answer cites are often forums and reference sites, which Verand labels user-generated and editorial. In a regulated field they are mostly not yours: a bar association directory, a state licensing board, BrokerCheck, SEC.gov, review sites and the trade press. The answer at the top of this page is an ordinary example. Four firms named, five sources cited, two of them one competitor's and one an SEC.gov page, and the firm the answer named is not among them.
The listings you control, your bar profile, your board record, your firm's page on your regulator's site, are worth getting right: they are what the answer gets built from when your site is not.
Compliance packs are researched from the regulators' own text and tested by Verand, not reviewed by a licensed attorney, and are not legal advice. The gate blocks outright what a rule forbids, and asks a named person for a written, logged reason on the claims it cannot judge alone.
Improvement
How to rank in Claude.
There is no position to hold, so ranking in Claude means being named early and cited often across the questions that matter. The tracker tells you where to start. The work is pages.
01Reachability
Be readable to the crawlers that feed it
Anthropic names three: ClaudeBot for training, Claude-User for the fetches a person's question triggers, and Claude-SearchBot for search. Blanket-blocking all three in robots.txt removes you from the surface this page measures. And because Claude's search leg is not Google's index, being crawled and ranked by Google is not on its own evidence that you are retrievable here.
02Your own facts
Answer the question, with your own facts
Claude with search on rewards pages that answer the exact question a buyer asked and carry something the model cannot get elsewhere: your credentials, your real outcomes, your stated opinions. Verand drafts from your knowledge base for that reason, and the topics table shows which subjects Claude handles without you. This is the practical content of what the SEO trade calls GEO or AEO: answer-shaped pages, cited claims, an author it can identify. The name is new. The work is not.
03The trend
Then read the rate, not the scan
Publish through the compliance gate, then read the trend in months rather than weeks, because a weekly assistant gives you four points a month. Start from the citation gap: a citation is the thing you can go and earn, and mentions tend to follow the pages that earn citations rather than lead them.
The point of the number
Found is one leg. The other two are why it moves.
A tracker on its own tells you Claude named a competitor instead of you, and then stops. Moving the number means publishing a page worth citing, and other trackers write content too: one of the Claude trackers we reviewed gates its own drafts on a content-quality score, so a gate before publishing is not unusual. What none of them mentions anywhere is compliance review, and for a regulated firm that is the difference between a fix and a new problem.
Written. Every draft comes out of your knowledge base: your credentials, your real client outcomes and your strong opinions, in your own words. That is what gives an answer a reason to cite you rather than a directory.
Found. Daily Google rank tracking and six AI assistants read for mentions, citations, sentiment and share of voice, against the same pages, in one account. Google rank tracking and Claude tracking are different jobs, and this is one place both run.
Tracked and gated. Then the compliance gate runs before anything can publish: 55 deterministic checks and your industry's rulebook, hard failures that block outright, review-tier claims needing a written, logged reason from a named person, and nothing live until someone at your firm presses publish.
Can you 1031 into a syndication? Sometimes. A syndication interest works as replacement property only if the structure holds like-kind real property, such as a tenant-in-common (TIC) share or a Delaware Statutory Trust (DST). Many standard LP interests in a partnership do not qualify, so eligibility depends on structure, not on the asset type.
The strategy is well established under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code, and the deadlines are fixed. You have 45 days to identify a replacement property and 180 days to close, and both clocks run together. Minimums, fee layers, and illiquidity also matter. This article walks through each rule with worked numbers. Investors earn a guaranteed annual return of 8%.
Key Takeaways
Not every syndication interest qualifies; the structure must be like-kind real property.
The 45-day identification and 180-day closing deadlines run together and do not extend.
TIC shares and properly structured DSTs are the common qualifying paths.
Minimums, fees, and reduced control are real trade-offs; confirm eligibility with a tax adviser.
How the 1031 Exchange and Its Deadlines Work
A 1031 exchange takes its name from Section 1031 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code.[1] It lets an investor defer capital gains by reinvesting sale proceeds into like-kind real estate. Deferral is not elimination, and the rules are mechanical. Miss one step and the deferral can be lost.
Two clocks start when your relinquished property sells. You must identify a replacement property within 45 days of the sale.[1] You must then complete the purchase within 180 days.[2] The 45-day identification and 180-day closing deadlines must both be met, and the 180 days include the first 45.[3]
Here is a dated sequence. Say your property closes on March 1. Your identification deadline lands in mid-April. Your closing deadline lands in late August. Those dates do not move because a sponsor is slow, an offering is oversubscribed, or documents are pending.
Notice what that does to your working calendar. The first 45 days are a decision window, not a research project. By the time you reach day 45, you need a named replacement option in writing, and the remaining 135 days are for closing on it. Investors who spend the first month browsing offerings with no shortlist often find the identification deadline arrives before they have verified a single sponsor.
Because of that, timing is the first filter for any syndication. Before you fall in love with an offering, ask whether it can verify you, accept your subscription, and close inside your window. In practice, the most common gap is between an investor's running 45-day clock and how fast verification and subscription can actually finish. Start those steps early, and treat any sponsor who cannot explain their timeline clearly as a warning sign rather than a minor inconvenience.
Citations, the sources list and the compliance disclaimer are locked and preserved. Edit the prose freely: it saves as you type, and Re-validate on the Report Card re-scores it.
The gate, on a real draft. This article scores 96 and still cannot publish. One sentence promises a guaranteed annual return, which the YMYL pack blocks outright: a hard failure carries no override, so nobody at your firm and nobody at Verand can wave it through. The screen shows the only thing that can happen next. A person rewrites the sentence, the article re-validates, and the readout goes from Blocked to Pass.
The other five
One of six AI assistants Verand tracks.
Nothing on this page is specific to Claude except the favicon, how the answer is collected and the cadence. The same prompt set, the same four facts and the same arithmetic run against five more.
Claude
Weekly
Asked directly with web search on, because no consumer read exists. The most expensive read in the set, which is why cadence is set per assistant rather than sold as a plan tier.
ChatGPT
Daily
Read from the consumer product with web search on, so it is the answer a buyer gets. An empty read falls back to a second path automatically and still reports as ChatGPT. Its tracker page.
Gemini
Daily
Also read from the consumer product, on the same daily cadence as ChatGPT. Its tracker page.
Google AI Overviews
Daily
The block above the blue links. It does not render for every query, and Verand records absence as absence rather than as a zero. Its tracker page.
Google AI Mode
Daily
Google's conversational surface, and not the same thing as AI Overviews. It always returns an answer, so its check count tracks your prompt count. Its tracker page.
Perplexity
Weekly
Asked directly as well, on the same weekly cadence as Claude and for the same reason. Its tracker page.
Engine coverage is where the plans differ: Starter reads three, Growth five, Professional and above all six, and Claude is in the top group. Onboarding asks all six whatever plan you pick, so the report card you see before the paywall includes Claude either way.
Questions
What people ask before the first scan.
Eight answers, including the ones that are limits rather than features.
What is a Claude visibility tracker?
A tool that asks Claude a fixed set of buyer questions on a schedule and records the answers: whether your brand was named, where among the brands it named, whether your site was cited, which rivals appeared beside you and how you were described. Verand asks every prompt once a week with web search on, stores every answer including the misses, and rolls them into Visibility Rate and Share of Voice. The same prompt set runs against five more assistants.
Does Claude cite its sources?
When it has searched, yes: a grounded answer carries inline citations you can click. When it answers from training knowledge, there is nothing to click. That is why named and cited are separate fields on every row here, and why they often disagree: Claude names a firm in prose while linking only the pages it retrieved. Verand reads Claude with web search on, so the answer it stores is the one that carries sources.
How does Claude search the web?
As a deliberate step rather than a reflex. Claude decides whether a question needs current information, and when it does the response arrives as a short preamble saying it is going to search, then the substantive answer with its annotations attached. It also reports the sub-queries it ran, which Verand keeps as fan-out rows: each one is a question being asked around your topic, and each can be tracked on its own or turned into a brief.
What search engine does Claude use?
Anthropic lists Brave Search as a web search subprocessor. It has not named a search partner in a product announcement, and a second web search subprocessor is listed alongside Brave, so treat this as what a subprocessor list says rather than as a published partnership. The part that matters either way: Claude's search leg is not Google's index, so ranking on Google does not on its own make you retrievable here.
How often should you check your Claude visibility?
Weekly, and Verand does not make it a setting. Cadence is fixed per assistant by what a check costs: Claude and Perplexity are asked on Mondays, while ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode are asked every day. It is not a plan feature and not a toggle. You can run a scan by hand whenever you want a fresh read, and that asks every assistant your plan covers at once.
How is Claude visibility different from ChatGPT visibility?
Three things differ and the rest is identical. Claude is asked directly because no consumer read exists for it; ChatGPT is read from the consumer product. Claude runs weekly and ChatGPT daily, because a Claude answer costs materially more to collect. And Claude names firms in prose while linking only what it retrieved, so mentioned and cited disagree on its rows more often. The prompt set, the recorded facts and the arithmetic are the same, which is what makes them comparable.
How do you get cited by Claude?
Start with the sources list, because a citation is the thing you can go and earn: it says which domains Claude built its answers from, and the topics table says which of your subjects it handles without you. Check first that you are reachable, since Claude's search leg is not Google's index and blocking ClaudeBot, Claude-User and Claude-SearchBot removes you from it. Then write the page to answer the exact question, from your own credentials and outcomes, and publish it through the compliance gate.
Can you track competitors in Claude?
Yes, and it costs nothing extra, because every tracked rival is scored from the same answer you were: named or not, in what order, and cited or not. That is what makes Share of Voice a count rather than an estimate. The number of rivals is set per site by plan, from 5 on Starter to 40 on Agency, and they are the same competitors the rest of the account already watches.
Customer stories
Operators growing with Verand.
repliers.43%of AI answers, up from 11%
How Repliers went from 11% to 43% of AI answers
“Every tool we tried told us how visible we were. Verand told us that and why we weren’t. It listed 60 developer questions where a competitor’s API got named instead of ours, drafted the answer to each one in our engineers’ voice, and we went from 11% of AI answers to 43% in two months. One of our best inbound channels now is a chatbot.”
Pat Arlia
Co-Founder & COO, Repliers
oneday4×AI citations
How Oneday opened a new client channel through ChatGPT
“Our clients find us by asking ChatGPT whether someone with their diagnosis can get life insurance. A year ago we weren’t in that answer. Amongst many things, Verand built a page for every condition we cover, checked every claim against the rules before it could publish, and our citations on ChatGPT and Gemini are up 4×. New clients tell us where they found us. It’s ChatGPT.”
Josh Teixeira
CEO, Oneday
46%of ChatGPT answers
How a Georgia rental community shows up in nearly half of ChatGPT’s answers
“Renters ask ChatGPT what it’s like to live near Robins Air Force Base. We’re in that answer now, with a link. Verand flagged that our address was written three different ways across the site, it generated the LocalBusiness schema, it wrote the Bonaire and Warner Robins guides, and it tracked which assistants picked them up. A property with 60 units shouldn’t be able to do this. We did it in a quarter.”
Marco Canonaco
Co-Founder, The Mill Gardens Apartments
Claude tracker
What Claude says about your firm, weekly. Then write the page it will cite, checked first.
Claude is checked weekly. Each answer is recorded with the page it cited and your position, and every finding becomes a draft your rules have already read.
ChatGPT
Gemini
AI Overviews
Perplexity
Claude
You
PerplexityRead answer
GeminiRead answer
ChatGPTRead answer
Google AI ModeRead answer
